Ahoto Taysir Mulazim v. RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director

03-6801Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit24 de set. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6801
AHOTO TAYSIR MULAZIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; GENE M. JOHNSON;
DAVID A. BRAXTON; CALVIN D. JAMISON; STEVE
BURCIN; CHARLES C. COSBY; CHERYL J.
FRYDRYSHOWSKI; J. THADIEU HARRIS, III; R. A.
YOUNG; P. SAUL; A. FLEENOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-02-1135-7)
Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 24, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ahoto Taysir Mulazim appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mulazim
v. Angelone, No. CA-02-1135-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.