Keith S. Davis v. WALTER W. STOUT, Judge

03-6651Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10 de jun. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6651
KEITH S. DAVIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WALTER W. STOUT, Judge; K. SCOTT MILES, Public
Defender; MICHELLE B. MITCHELL, Richmond City
Jail Sheriff,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (CA-03-259-2)
Submitted: May 28, 2003 Decided: June 10, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith S. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Keith S. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Davis v. Stout, No. CA-03-259-2
(E.D. Va. April 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.