Albert Charles Burgess, Jr v. Blake E. Taylor, Jr

03-6542Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de jun. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6542
ALBERT CHARLES BURGESS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BLAKE E. TAYLOR, JR.; JOTTE SCARBOROUGH,
individually and in their official capacities
as employees of the South Carolina Department
of Corrections (SCDC),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Cameron M. Currie, District Judge.
(CA-02-1090-8-22)
Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 25, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Leon Morrison,
DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burgess
v. Taylor, No. CA-02-1090-8-22 (D.S.C. Mar. 21, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.