Clarence S. Gregory v. ROBERT E. WARD, Regional Director

03-6531Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 de jun. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

* This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6531
CLARENCE S. GREGORY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT E. WARD, Regional Director; DORIS
GANTT, Correctional Officer; THIERRY D.
NETTLES, Captain; MARGUERITE TOMASINO,
Investigator; LINDA BOWMAN, Correctional
Officer; MARK COTE, Lieutenant Correctional
Officer; CHARLES WHITTEN, Captain and
Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(CA-02-44-3-25BC)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 19, 2003
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Clarence S. Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Senn,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Clarence S. Gregory appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Gregory v. Ward, No. CA-02-44-3-25BC (D.S.C. Feb. 26, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.