03-6093•William A. Veney v. Thomas C. Younce
03-6093Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de abr. de 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6093
WILLIAM A. VENEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS C. YOUNCE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-1172-7)
Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Veney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William A. Veney appeals the district court’s orders denying
his request for injunctive relief and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Veney v. Younce, No. CA-02-1172-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 4, 2002;
Jan. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.