Kam Richard Carpenter v. Robert Benfield

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6025
KAM RICHARD CARPENTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT BENFIELD; ANGELA TWITTY; JOHNATHAN
STINES; DAVID G. BOBO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-255-1-1-MU)
Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 28, 2003
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kam Richard Carpenter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kam Richard Carpenter appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Carpenter’s motion for a certificate of appealability as
unnecessary and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Carpenter v. Benfield, No. CA-02-255-1-1-MU (W.D.N.C.
filed Nov. 26, 2002; entered Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --