Israel Ghigbu Iwuoha v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992 . Accordingly, we deny the

03-2536Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de set. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2536
ISRAEL GHIGBU IWUOHA,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A70-510-853)
Submitted: September 20, 2004 Decided: September 29, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd F. Ukwu, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler,
Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director,
Nancy E. Friedman, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

PER CURIAM:
Israel Ghigbu Iwuoha, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen deportation
proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
Iwuoha’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2)
(2004); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See
In re: Iwuoha, No. A70-510-853 (B.I.A. Dec. 3, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.