Thomas J. Squirek v. the Law Offices of Sessoms & Rogers, P.a

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1746
THOMAS J. SQUIREK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE LAW OFFICES OF SESSOMS & ROGERS, P.A.;
STUART M. SESSOMS, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-02-40-1)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 20, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas J. Squirek, Appellant Pro Se. E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III,
Joshua Blake Durham, POYNER & SPRUILL, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Stuart M. Sessoms, SESSOMS & ROGERS, P.A., Durham, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas J. Squirek appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint against the Law Offices of Sessoms &
Rogers, P.A., and Stuart M. Sessoms, Jr. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Squirek v. Law Offices of
Sessoms & Rogers, P.A., No. CA-02-40-1 (M.D.N.C. May 5, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --