Mary Anne Pikkert v. Alexander Pastene

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1212
MARY ANNE PIKKERT,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALEXANDER PASTENE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-03-22-23AJ)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Pastene, Appellant Pro Se. David Scott Mathews, JASPER
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Ridgeland, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Pastene seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order
remanding his civil action to state court. The magistrate judge’s
remand order is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --