Christine Kling v. Harris Teeter, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1128
CHRISTINE KLING; CYNTHIA KLING,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
HARRIS TEETER, INCORPORATED; CITY OF MONROE,
NORTH CAROLINA, a body politic and corporate;
C. S. HORNE, a/k/a Chris Horne, individually
and in his capacity as an officer of Monroe
Public Safety,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. H. Brent McKnight,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-609-3)
Submitted: August 29, 2003 Decided: February 10, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chiege O. Kalu Okwara, LAW OFFICE OF CHIEGE O. KALU OKWARA,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellants. Kenneth R. Raynor, Amy
F. Wise, TEMPLETON & RAYNOR, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina;
Anthony T. Lathrop, McNeill Y. Wester, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLC,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of
the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Christine Kling and Cynthia Kling appeal the magistrate
judge’s order * granting summary judgment for Defendants in the
Klings’ civil action. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint
appendix, and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate
judge. See Kling v. Harris Teeter, Inc., No. CA-00-609-3 (W.D.N.C.
Dec. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --