Anthony Lynch-Bey v. D. A. GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden

02-7333Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 de nov. de 2002

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7333
ANTHONY LYNCH-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. A. GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden; C. E. DAVIS,
Warden; K. W. DAVIS, Warden; M.C. MILLARD,
Associate Warden; G. P. WILLIAMS, Associate
Warden; S. T. AVENT, Associate Warden, FRANK
ROACH, Housing Unit Manager; B. AUTRY, Inmate
Hearing; L. T. EDMONDS, Housing Unit; JOHN
DOE, Agent of Defendant Garraghty,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-01-470-3)
Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 15, 2002
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Lynch-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Lynch-Bey appeals the district court’s orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Lynch-Bey v. Garraghty, No. CA-
01-470-3 (E.D. Va. July 3 & Aug. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.