Larry Gary, Jr v. B. E. David

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6840
LARRY GARY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. E. DAVID; R. L. HOPPER; R. H. SIZEMORE; B.
S. DOBBS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-00-572-1)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Gary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr.,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Gary, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. In
the briefing order, Gary was warned that this court would not
consider issues not specifically raised in his informal brief. See
Local R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Gary’s informal brief does not
challenge the district court’s finding that he had filed his
complaint outside the three-year limitations period, but instead
addresses the merits of his claims. Accordingly, we affirm. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --