Lent Christopher Carr, Ii v. Pitt Greenville Adult Probation Office of North Carolina

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6344
LENT CHRISTOPHER CARR, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PITT GREENVILLE ADULT PROBATION OFFICE OF
NORTH CAROLINA; LISA FORNES; MIKE WILLIAMS,
ELVY FORREST,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CITY OF GREENVILLE; PITT COUNTY; PITT COUNTY
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; NANCY JENKINS, Mayor;
BILLY VANDIFORD, Former Sheriff; JOHN DOE, I;
JOHN DOE, II; JOHN DOE, III; JOHN DOE, IV,
Deputy; JOHN DOE, V; JOHN DOE, VI; JOHN DOE,
VII; BILL SIRGINSON, in their individual and
official capacities,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-01-338-5-H)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lent Christopher Carr, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lent Christopher Carr, II, appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Carr v. City of
Greenville, No. CA-01-338-5-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --