Benjamin A. Johnson v. Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack

02-2258Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de jul. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2258
BENJAMIN A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK; UNUM LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-02-381-2)
Submitted: May 23, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr.,
Kimberly W. Daniel, TROUTMAN SANDERS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia;
Edwin Ford Stephens, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action on res judicata and statute of
limitations grounds. We have independently reviewed the record and
find no error in the district court’s dismissal. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson
v. Pep Boys, No. CA-02-381-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.