Donald Hodgson v. Shenandoah’s Pride Dairy

02-1583Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit31 de jul. de 2002

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1583
DONALD HODGSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHENANDOAH’S PRIDE DAIRY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (CA-01-29-5)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Hodgson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffery M. Ricapito, KRUPIN,
GREENBAUM & O’BRIEN, Washington, D.C.; Bonnie Lineweaver Paul,
Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Hodgson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his action alleging a violation of the Americans with
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp.
2001), by his employer. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hodgson v.
Shenandoah’s Pride, No. CA-01-29-5 (W.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.