01-7825•United States of America v. Nathaniel Renard Chiles
01-7825Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 de fev. de 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7825
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NATHANIEL RENARD CHILES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-94-7, CA-01-36-7)
Submitted: February 11, 2002 Decided: February 28, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Renard Chiles, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge
Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Renard Chiles seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Chiles’ motion for a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See United States v. Chiles, Nos. CR-94-7; CA-01-36-7
(W.D. Va. July 12 & Oct. 25, 2001). We also deny Chiles’ motion to
expedite his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.