Melvin S. Muldrow, Sr v. PARRIS GLENDENING, Govenor

01-7428Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 de dez. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7428
MELVIN S. MULDROW, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PARRIS GLENDENING, Govenor; STEWART Q. SIMMS,
Commissioner P.S.; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.,
Commissioner D.C.; RALPH LOGAN, Warden; MAJOR
FERNANDEZ, Shift Commander; S. FOSTER, S-Sec
Reg C.O. II; L. BRISCO, C.O. 1,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
00-2416-PJM)
Submitted: November 26, 2001 Decided: December 19, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melvin S. Muldrow, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Melvin S. Muldrow, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) com-
plaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Muldrow v. Glendening, No. CA-00-2416-
PJM (D. Md., filed July 19, 2001, entered July 20, 2001, & filed
Aug. 13, 2001, entered Aug. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.