01-7413•United States of America v. Tobaris Anibal Paul, a/k/a Big Shot, a/k/a Shot
01-7413Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2 de jan. de 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7413
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TOBARIS ANIBAL PAUL, a/k/a Big Shot, a/k/a
Shot,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District
Judge. (CR-97-9-4, CA-99-120-4)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tobaris Anibal Paul, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tobaris Anibal Paul seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Paul, Nos. CR-97-9-4; CA-
99-120-4 (E.D. Va. dated July 17, 2001, entered July 18, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.