Rafael Cornelio Matos Brito v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . We dismiss…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7370
RAFAEL CORNELIO MATOS BRITO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BILL D. BURLINGTON; MARGARET C. HAMBRICK;
HARRELL WATTS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JANET RENO, Attorney General; KATHLEEN HAWKIN,
B.O.P., Director; JOSEPH BROOKS, Pet. VA -
Warden; F. S. WHEELER,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-810-3)
Submitted: December 10, 2001 Decided: December 27, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rafael Cornelio Matos Brito, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Rafael Cornelio Matos Brito appeals the dismissal in part of
his civil rights complaint brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is
not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --