Michael Bradley v. H. David Burton

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7172
MICHAEL BRADLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
H. DAVID BURTON; SETH HUNT; LAWRENCE THOMPSON;
JOHN DOE; TED NELSON; HAE JIN CHUNG; SHARON
WHITAKER; BARBARA FRADY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-114-1-MU)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Bradley appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Bradley v. Burton, No. CA-01-114-1-MU (W.D.N.C.
July 2, 2001). We deny Bradley’s motion for appointment a guardian
ad litem. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --