Phenroy Day v. Philip Spratley, Iii

01-7170Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29 de out. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7170
PHENROY DAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PHILIP SPRATLEY, III; B. COLEMAN, Arresting
Officer who works for Chief of Police Menetti;
B. J. ROBERTS, Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CITY OF HAMPTON; COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE; SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-99-1160-A)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 29, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Phenroy Day, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Samuel Lawrence
Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Phenroy Day appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Day v. City of Hampton, No. CA-99-1160-A (E.D.
Va. June 14, 2001). We deny Day’s motion for appointment of appel-
late counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.