Gregory Marshall v. ROBERT KUPEC, Warden, E.C.I

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7047
GREGORY MARSHALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT KUPEC, Warden, E.C.I.; DEBORAH PULLER,
Psychologist, E.C.I.; ROBERT D. RITCHEY,
Chief, E.C.I.; RAZAAK ENIOLA, Medical Direc-
tor, E.C.I.; KEITH MUIR, H.T., Officer, CO II,
E.C.I.; DOCTOR LINN, E.C.I.; KEVIN JOHNSON,
Nurse, E.C.I.; MR. JIM, L.P.N., Nurse, Pa-
tuxent; AMY HYMAN, Psychologist, Patuxent;
RAYMOND WILSON, Psychologist, Patuxent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-00-3322-AW)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Michael Joseph
Lentz, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Marshall appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint and
denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Marshall v. Kupec, No. CA-00-3322-AW (D. Md. June 6 & 12, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for
appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --