Michael Bradley v. Anderson, No. 00-7770 pending , ordering him to remit a $50 partial filing fee…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6644
MICHAEL BRADLEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM ANDERSON, Warden; MICHAEL EASLEY,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-265-1-02-MU)
Submitted: August 24, 2001 Decided: October 10, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Bradley appeals the district court’s order granting in
part and denying in part his motion to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis in Bradley v. Anderson, No. 00-7770 (pending), ordering
him to remit a $50 partial filing fee within thirty days. He also
appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for recon-
sideration of the imposition of a partial filing fee. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the present
appeal, and dismiss this appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See Bradley v. Anderson, No. CA-00-265-1-02-MU (W.D.N.C.
Jan. 17, 2001; Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --