Morris Barbour v. Hellen Ray

01-6404Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12 de jun. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6404
MORRIS BARBOUR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HELLEN RAY; DOCTOR SHUDELL; DOCTOR SMITH;
DOCTOR FORD; CAPTAIN PEELE; R. C. LEE, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-79-5-BR)
Submitted: May 22, 2001 Decided: June 12, 2001
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Morris Barbour, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Morris Barbour appeals the district court’s order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal
fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. According-
ly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
See Barbour v. Ray, No. CA-01-79-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.