Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury v. F. Fields

01-6284Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de abr. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6284
MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
F. FIELDS; MR. GLENDE; D. SPACNOULA; T. BRUN-
SON; D. L. BAYLOR; MR. MORRIS; MR. MCINTIRE;
MR. MOREHEAD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-60)
Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 23, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Muhammad Eury appeals the district court’s order denying re-
lief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Eury v. Fields, No. CA-01-60 (E.D. Va.
Feb. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.