George J. Taylor v. Ronald Hutchinson

01-6279Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de mai. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6279
GEORGE J. TAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD HUTCHINSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-01-24-AW)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George J. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George J. Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his motion, which the district court properly construed as a 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s motion for a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Taylor v. Hutchinson, No. CA-01-24-AW (D. Md. filed Jan.
17, 2001; entered Jan. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.