Leroy Holmes v. Steven Lenes

01-6249Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25 de mai. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6249
LEROY HOLMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STEVEN LENES; JOSEPH BLACK; MICHAEL SHEEDY;
WILLIE WELDON; NURSE DRAFFIN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MAE BROWN; GAIL FRICKS; ROBERT C. WOODS;
WILLIAM CATOE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenwood. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-488-9-20RB)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Leroy Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Jackson L. Barwick, Jr., Chapin,
South Carolina; Norma Anne Turner Jett, EARLY & NESS, Bamberg,
South Carolina; Phillip Florence, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON &
LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Leroy Holmes appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Holmes v. Lenes, No. CA-00-488-9-20RB (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.