United States of America v. Paul Nagy

01-6149Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 de jun. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6149
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PAUL NAGY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-951-5-BO-2)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Bredenberg, Jerri Ulrica
Dunston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Nagy, No. CA-98-951-5-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 13, 2000; entered
Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.