Daniel Leo Williams v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The

01-6110Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit4 de mai. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6110
DANIEL LEO WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MR. WOODARD; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COR-
RECTIONS, Division of Health Services; DOCTOR
LIGHTSEY; DOCTOR KYERMARTEN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; THEODIS BECK,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-267-5-3-F)
Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Leo Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Leo Williams appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing one of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2000) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.