Archibald Laud-Hammond v. MARK REGER, Individually

01-2498Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit22 de mai. de 2002

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2498
ARCHIBALD LAUD-HAMMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARK REGER, Individually and as employee of
Johnson C. Smith University,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF JOHNSON C. SMITH
UNIVERSITY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-18)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Archibald Laud-Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. William Porter Farthing,
Jr., Stacy Kaplan Wood, John Barnwell Anderson, PARKER, POE, ADAMS
& BERNSTEIN, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Archibald Laud-Hammond appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment to the Appellee in his discrimination
action, dismissing his defamation action, dismissing the Appellee’s
employer as a defendant, and denying his motion to amend his
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Laud-Hammond v. Reger, No. CA-00-
18 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.