WILBERT HATCHER FREELAND, Individually v. FRANCIS B. CHILDRESS, Trooper First Class, Individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2407
WILBERT HATCHER FREELAND, Individually;
CHRISTINE EVADNEY FREELAND, Individually;
MASSIEKA HOLNESS, Individually, daughter of
Christine E. Freeland and stepdaughter of
Wilbert H. Freeland; DEJOURNE FREELAND, a
minor by Wilbert Hatcher Freeland, Christine
Evadney Freeland, her father and mother;
MONICA FFRENCH, Individually, mother of
Christine E. Freeland, grandmother of Massieka
H. Holness and Dejourne Freeland, mother in
law of Wilbert H. Freeland,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
FRANCIS B. CHILDRESS, Trooper First Class,
Individually and as a State Police, Bureau of
Drug and Criminal Enforcement, Westminster
Barracks,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MARYLAND STATE POLICE; OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND
TOWN COUNCIL; SUPERINTENDENT, of the Maryland
State Police,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-99-3552-WMN)

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: April 8, 2002
Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilbert Hatcher Freeland, Christine Evadney Freeland, Massieka
Holness, Dejourne Freeland, Monica Ffrench, Appellants Pro Se.
Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on
their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Freeland v. Childress, No. CA-99-3552-WMN (D.
Md. Oct. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --