Donald M. Alford v. George F. Meltzer, individually

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2121
DONALD M. ALFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE F. MELTZER, individually and as an
employee of Snyder National Carriers, In-
corporated; SCHNEIDER SPECIALIZED CARRIERS,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SNYDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-6-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2002 Decided: March 11, 2002
Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Donald M. Alford, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel C. Cooper, STEPTOE &
JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Donald M. Alford appeals the district court’s judgment
entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict in favor of the Appellees in
this civil action and the court’s order denying his motion for a
new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
orders and find no reversible error. Alford offers only conclusory
assertions in support of his claim that the Appellees were re-
sponsible for his automobile accident. In addition, Alford failed
to object to Appellees’ cross-examination of Alford regarding his
medication, and failed to move for judgment as a matter of law
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b). Accordingly, we affirm. See
Alford v. Meltzer, No. CA-99-6-1 (N.D.W. Va. filed Sept. 7, 2001,
entered Sept. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --