Pepi Schafler, Dr v. SCOTT D. FIELD, Esquire

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2118
PEPI SCHAFLER, DR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SCOTT D. FIELD, Esquire; REZNICK FEDDER &
SILVERMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-01-984-AW)
Submitted: January 15, 2002 Decided: February 5, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Doctor Pepi Schafler, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Oestreicher,
WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order granting
the Appellees’ motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Schafler v. Field, No. CA-01-984-AW (D. Md.
filed Aug. 22, 2001; entered Aug. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --