Charles E. Brooks v. Lloyd Albert Johnson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2032
CHARLES E. BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LLOYD ALBERT JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; CANDICE
SANTOS; STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-00-1878-AW)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 13, 2002
Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
by unpublished Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Kenneth E. McPherson, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellant. J.
Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Randolph Stuart
Sergent, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Brooks appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
Brooks contends that the district court erred in finding defendant
Lloyd Albert Johnson, a Maryland Assistant State’s Attorney, was
entitled to qualified immunity. Our review of the record and the
district court’s opinion show the district court correctly found
Johnson was entitled to qualified immunity. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s dismissal of Brooks’ civil action.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --