Patricia Klaiber v. Nicholas Rinaldi, individually

01-1950Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 de jan. de 2002

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1950
PATRICIA KLAIBER; BRENDA MILLER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
NICHOLAS RINALDI, individually, and in his
official capacity with the United States
Postal Service; B. J. THOMPSON, individually,
and in his official capacity with the United
States Postal Service; WILLIAM J. HENDERSON,
in his official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-99-541-1)
Submitted: December 18, 2001 Decided: January 11, 2002
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Klaiber, Brenda Miller, Appellants Pro Se. David George
Karro, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Klaiber and Brenda Miller appeal the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to Appellees on all of their
employment discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Klaiber v.
Rinaldi, No. CA-99-541-1 (M.D.N.C. June 21, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.