George E. Korcsmaros v. Fluor Corporation Long Term Disability Plan

01-1385Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 de set. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1385
GEORGE E. KORCSMAROS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FLUOR CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN;
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a
subsidiary of Cigna Corporation,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPO-
RATED; CIGNA INTEGRATED CARE, a/k/a Cigna
Group Insurance,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District
Judge. (CA-00-401-5)
Submitted: August 24, 2001 Decided: September 11, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Hoyt E. Glazer, LAW OFFICES OF STUART CALWELL, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellant. William M. Hassan, KLETT, ROONEY, LIEBER
& SCHORLING, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
George E. Korcsmaros appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Korcsmaros
v. Fluor Corp. Long Term Disability Plan, No. CA-00-401-5 (S.D.W.
Va. Feb. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.