Isaiah Harley v. Victoria A. Lambert

01-1346Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 de jun. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1346
ISAIAH HARLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VICTORIA A. LAMBERT; LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
99-2862-CCB)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaiah Harley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Isaiah Harley seeks to appeal an order of the district court
purportedly entered on March 2, 2001. The district court docket
sheet reflects that there was no order entered by the court on or
around that date. To the extent Harley seeks to appeal the dis-
trict court’s order filed on September 28, 1999, and entered on the
district court’s docket on September 29, 1999, dismissing his civil
complaint as frivolous, Harley already has appealed that order, and
we affirmed the district court’s dismissal. Harley v. Lambert, No.
99-2403 (4th Cir. Dec. 21, 1999) (unpublished). We therefore dis-
miss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.