Nicholas Antonio Crocetti v. Ceres Marine Terminals, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1074
NICHOLAS ANTONIO CROCETTI,
Petitioner,
versus
CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INCORPORATED; DIREC-
TOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(00-297)
Submitted: June 29, 2001 Decided: July 16, 2001
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael C. Eisenstein, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. James
M. Mesnard, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Nicholas Antonio Crocetti seeks review of the Benefits Review
Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s
award and computation of benefits pursuant to the Longshore and
Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986
& Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s
decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.
See Crocetti v. Ceres Marine Term., No. 00-297 (BRB Nov. 29, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --