William M. Wray v. PATRICK CONROY, Warden

00-7762Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit9 de abr. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7762
WILLIAM M. WRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICK CONROY, Warden; OFFICERS, S.R.T. (7-3
Shift) Staff; S.R.T. SERGEANT JOHNSON; D.
JOHNSON, C.O. II (Division of Correction),
M.H.C.-X,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
00-1348-PJM)
Submitted: March 30, 2001 Decided: April 9, 2001
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William M. Wray, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William M. Wray appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Wray v. Conroy, No. CA-00-1348-PJM (D. Md.
Nov. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.