Christopher M. Hutchinson v. ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden PCC, Virginia Parole Board

00-7306Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 de mar. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7306
CHRISTOPHER M. HUTCHINSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden PCC, Virginia Parole
Board,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-99-1675-AM)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 15, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brent Alan Jackson, JACKSON, PICKUS & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher M. Hutchinson seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. Hutchinson v. Baskerville,
No. CA-99-1675-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2000); see Warren v. Basker-
ville, 233 F.3d 204, 206-08 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.