Sa’id Abdullah Al’rashid v. Doug Catoe

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7255
SA’ID ABDULLAH AL’RASHID,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOUG CATOE; LAURIE F. BESSINGER; JOYCE BROWN;
SAMUAL K. LEWIS; JOHN NORRIS; MARY SELF; SER-
GEANT PARKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.
(CA-99-459-3-19BC)
Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sa’id Abdullah Al’Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick
Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sa’id Abdullah Al’Rashid appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Al’Rashid v. Catoe, No. CA-99-459-3-19BC (D.S.C.
filed July 27, 2000; entered July 28, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --