Garfield William Holley v. D. BAKER, Correctional Officer, Keen Mountain Correctional Center

00-6698Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 de set. de 2000

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6698
GARFIELD WILLIAM HOLLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
D. BAKER, Correctional Officer, Keen Mountain
Correctional Center,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
R. A. YOUNG, Regional Director, Keen Mountain
Correctional Center,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Pamela M. Sargent, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-98-643-7)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

* The parties consented to have this matter tried by a
magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994).
2
Garfield William Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett
Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Garfield William Holley appeals magistrate judge’s order deny-
ing his motions to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of Appel-
lee and to alter or amend its final judgment. * We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of
discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district
court. See Holley v. Baker, No. CA-98-643-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 26,
2000). We also deny Holley’s motion for the appointment of coun-
sel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.