Earl Anderson Franklin v. N. CARLTON TILLEY, JR., United States District Judge

00-6463Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de mai. de 2000

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6463
EARL ANDERSON FRANKLIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
N. CARLTON TILLEY, JR., United States District
Judge; LISA BLUE BOGGS; GREGORY VINCENT DAVIS;
WILLIAM E. MARTIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-203-1)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl Anderson Franklin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Earl Anderson Franklin appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Franklin v. Tilley, No. CA-00-203-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 24,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.