00-6451•Anse C. Blake v. Warden Fox
00-6451Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12 de set. de 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6451
ANSE C. BLAKE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN FOX,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-1118-3)
Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 12, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anse C. Blake, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Perry Macia, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anse C. Blake appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court.
See Blake v. Fox, No. CA-98-1118-3 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 15, 2000). We
also deny Blake’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.