00-6380•Jose Arellano v. Dean Walker
00-6380Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit17 de mai. de 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6380
JOSE ARELLANO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DEAN WALKER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-208-5-BR)
Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Arellano, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OF-
FICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jose Arellano seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment
and order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §
2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the mag-
istrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Arellano v. Walker, CA-99-208-5-
BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.