Lori A. Walters v. Orangeburg County

00-2442Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit1 de ago. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2442
LORI A. WALTERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ORANGEBURG COUNTY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-99-1115-5-22BC)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: August 1, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and Frederic N. SMALKIN,
United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting
by designation.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric S. Bland, ERIC S. BLAND & ASSOCIATES, P.A., Columbia, South
Carolina; Lawrence J. Needle, LAWRENCE J. NEEDLE, P.A., Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellant. D.L. (Dirk) Aydlette, Shahin Vafai,
GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Lori Walters appeals the district court’s orders granting
summary judgment to the Defendant and denying Walters’ motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walters v. Orange-
burg County, No. CA-99-1115-5-22BC (D.S.C. filed Aug. 1, 2000;
entered Aug. 2, 2000, and Oct. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.