Tony Lovette v. Sonoco Products Company

00-2336Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit23 de mar. de 2001

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2336
TONY LOVETTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
RUDOLPH S. SCOTT, JR.; JULIUS C. HIGGINS,
Plaintiffs,
versus
SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-437-3-17)
Submitted: March 9, 2001 Decided: March 23, 2001
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cletus K. Okpalaeke, OKPALAEKE LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellant. James M. Powell, Linda B. Rogers, HAYNSWORTH, BALD-
WIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C., Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Tony Lovette appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Sonoco Products
Company, in his civil action alleging employment discrimination and
wrongful termination. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Lovette v. Sonoco Prods. Co.,
No. CA-99-437-3-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.