Sheldon Vann v. Avx Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2073
SHELDON VANN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AVX CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-98-3481-4-24BC)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sheldon Vann, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Allen Bright, Charles Edgar
McDonald, III, HAYNSWORTH, BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C.,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sheldon Vann appeals from the district court’s final judgment
based on the jury’s verdict in favor of Appellee in this civil
action, as well as the jury’s verdict itself. Vann also appeals
from the district court’s adverse order partially granting summary
judgment in favor of Appellee on Vann’s harassment claim brought
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e (West 1994), and his discriminatory failure to
promote claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West 1994 &
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
jury’s verdict, and the district court’s order on the reasoning of
the district court. Vann v. AVX Corporation, No. CA-98-3481-4-24BC
(D.S.C. June 13, 2000; July 14, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --