00-1899•Gretha M. Hurst v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED, a/k/a Home Depot
00-1899Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit8 de jan. de 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1899
GRETHA M. HURST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED, a/k/a Home
Depot,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-1334-11)
Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 8, 2001
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
G. Thomas Hill, HILL, HILL & HILL, Ravenel, South Carolina, for Ap-
pellant. James H. Elliott, Jr., BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON &
HELMS, L.L.C., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gretha M. Hurst appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in Appellee’s favor in this personal injury
action. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix,
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Hurst v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. No. CA-99-1334-2-11 (D.S.C. June
20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument will not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.