Sandra Tury v. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. CA-98-924-2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1813
SANDRA TURY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
R. TURY,
Plaintiff,
versus
R.H. PETERS CHEVROLET, INCORPORATED, a
corporation,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,
Senior District Judge. (CA-98-924-2)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 6, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Sandra Tury, Appellant Pro Se. Frank M. Armada, Hurricane, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Sandra Tury appeals the district court’s order dismissing her
civil action. She claims that the district court erred in denying
her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider its order dismissing
her complaint because her attorney did not act in accordance with
her wishes. This issue is a contractual matter between Tury and
her attorney, and is not a basis upon which to reinstate her action
against Appellee. See generally Sanchez v. United States Postal
Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986) (holding that there is
no right to effective assistance of counsel in civil cases). Thus,
the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Tury’s
Rule 60(b) motion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
court. See Tury v. R.H. Peters Chevrolet, Inc., No. CA-98-924-2
(S.D.W. Va. May 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --